Updated: Nov 14
Sent: November 23, 2021 10:44 AM To: email@example.com Subject: "Doctors say the kids' COVID-19 vaccine is a booster for mental health" Dear Sir, I drafted the below email to Nicole Ireland at the CBC; however when I tried to find her contact information it became abundantly clear that no one at the CBC wants to publish their email addresses, presumably because they don’t want to receive constructive criticism. Therefore, please accept the below email as my complaint to Ms. Ireland, and to the CBC in general. I have been thoroughly disgusted by the CBC’s blatant agenda of quashing scientific discourse and promoting an experimental “vaccine” that doesn’t prevent transmission over the past months. Notwithstanding our communist dictator’s plans for Canada, we still live in a democracy, and I am sick of being told by the CBC, with its blatant statist narrative, what to think. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ms. Ireland, I don’t often read CBC news, as it tends to increase my blood pressure to unhealthy levels, but I was forwarded your “Second Opinion” article (opinion? state propaganda tool? entry for the 2021 cognitive dissonance award?) this morning by a friend. (Here is the link, for those cc’d who haven’t had the pleasure yet: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/covid-19-kids-vaccine-mental-health-1.6256089.) I clicked onto your bio link, but your description doesn’t mention whether you have children or not. I’m going to be charitable and assume you don’t have children, since you don’t seem to have even the smallest comprehension of the role of a parent in protecting his or her children from harm. I have been a parent to a highly anxious child for the past decade, and I therefore feel very qualified to speak to your article about 7 year-old Katalina Graimaldos-Ferreira, who has “a fear that she’ll bring COVID-19 home to her immunocompromised father”. Her mother advises that one of the reasons for Katalina’s vaccination is to “give her a ‘sense of security’”, per your article. I can’t even begin to list all of the issues with these statements – but of course, I will try, because the health of our youth is at stake.
Your assumption that COVID-19 has created anxiety and depression in children is deliberately obtuse. You know as well as I do that the fatality rate of COVID-19 is similar to (or lower than) the flu in most demographics of the population. The only reason that children are feeling stressed about this disease is because they have been bombarded with fear-mongering messaging by mainstream media (including, or maybe especially, the CBC) for the past twenty months. Never mind that a healthy young person has a greater risk of dying in a car accident (or from the COVID-19 vaccine) than from this virus, or that it STILL has a 99.97% survivability rate without any treatment at all. (We won’t even talk about early treatment such as monoclonal antibodies, Ivermectin, Quercetin, NAC, Vitamin D or Zinc, as they are not profitable to our overlords in Big Pharma.)
A parent’s job is to help a child identify issues that stress them, and help them to internally assess their level of risk and resolve that anxiety. Healthy coping mechanisms for a 7 year-old might include play therapy, being given a “worry monster” in which to insert his or her written fears, and utilizing breathing exercises in order to alleviate physical symptoms of anxiety. It is NEVER a parent’s job to superimpose her fears onto her child, or teach that child that stress relief is found in an external source (ie, an experimental vaccine that has not been approved to prevent the transmission of a virus). Your article promoting the vaccine as a coping mechanism for anxiety is disgusting, and is the ideal precursor to setting these kids up for drug dependency later on in their lives when they seek other external mechanisms to self-soothe.
You claim to be a journalist. Please start acting like one. Do your research and find out how many healthy children have died of COVID-19 in the past 2 years. Then, hop onto VAERS and start researching the young kids who have recently started dying or exhibiting severe adverse effects from the COVID-19 vaccine, noting that there is no such thing as “mild” myocarditis (the death rate, of course, being over 50% five years after such a diagnosis). Or better yet, call up Maddie de Garay’s mom, or Sean Hartman’s parents, or relatives of any of the youth in Canada and the US who have been permanently disabled or killed by these “vaccines” and ask them if the vaccine is the solution to “anxiety”. I think Maddie is probably pretty anxious about whether she will ever walk again. And I’m confident that Sean’s parents are wishing that he hadn’t worried about playing hockey more than his cardiovascular health. If you need a longer list of those affected negatively by the “vaccines”, please let me know. I’d be happy to compile this for you – although, since you are the “journalist”, you should probably be able to do this by yourself.
Speaking of journalism, a great late breaking story on the CBC would be all of the conflicts of interest between Big Pharma and our various governmental entities and health officers. One only needs to start looking at the “grants” that Pfizer has so generously donated to “scientists” and others worldwide to realize the serious ethical concerns that should be raised by vaccine usage. What’s that? Right – I forgot that mainstream media gets their share of Pfizerbucks as well. Nothing to see here! And certainly nothing to report.
As a good employee of Canada’s Pravda, you have, of course, identified the real reason that children should be vaccinated, and that is to promote our socialist government’s agenda of sacrificing the individual for “the greater good”. Why should any child be saddled with the obligation of saving her parents or grandparents by risking her own health, fertility and longevity? No self-respecting parent or grandparent would ever ask for that sacrifice from a child – self respect obviously not being part of the genetic makeup of most “adults” at present.
Kudos to you for promoting a product whose efficacy starts waning immediately after administration. Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and all of the other proven criminals masquerading as pharmaceutical companies are rubbing their hands in glee at your promotion of a lifelong customer base. Boosters every 4-6 months for the foreseeable future sounds like a more than profitable business model for Big Pharma, especially when recent studies show that after 8 months post-vaccine, one’s likelihood of contracting COVID-19 is actually greater in those who were “vaccinated”. The fact that the clinical trials for 5-11 year olds were too short in duration and too small in number to identify any serious effects with the COVID-19 vaccine is, apparently, irrelevant to whether such a model is medically ethical. And the fact that we don’t know what will happen long term to children who are repeatedly exposed to mRNA technology over the course of their formative years is, apparently, not a very interesting scientific question to anyone in the medical community.
I’m not sure why I keep shouting into the abyss, except that it is the morally right thing to do. At one point, I cared about the motivation of all of the people who are currently lying to promote the state narrative. Now I don’t: whether you are acting out of stupidity, greed, or a selfish desire to hold onto your job, the net result to you and your kind will be the same when the truth is set free.
If you’d like to discuss any of the points above, or need a reading list, please let me know. Otherwise, I’ll see you at the trials!