"The right to choose is a woman's right and a woman's right alone"

Sent: May 5, 2022 9:02 AM To: 'justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca' <justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca>; 'karina.gould@parl.gc.ca' <karina.gould@parl.gc.ca> Cc: 'tracy.gray@parl.gc.ca' <tracy.gray@parl.gc.ca>; 'michelle.rempel@parl.gc.ca' <michelle.rempel@parl.gc.ca>; 'chrystia.freeland@dpmo-cvpm.gc.ca' <chrystia.freeland@dpmo-cvpm.gc.ca>; 'Jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca' <Jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>; 'Elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca' <Elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>; 'yves-francois.blanchet@parl.gc.ca' <yves-francois.blanchet@parl.gc.ca>; 'jean-yves.duclos@parl.gc.ca' <jean-yves.duclos@parl.gc.ca>; 'omar.alghabra@parl.gc.ca' <omar.alghabra@parl.gc.ca> Subject: "The right to choose is a woman's right and a woman's right alone"

Mr. Trudeau and Ms. Gould,

This week, Mr. Trudeau made the above statement in reference to the leaked Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. Ms. Gould went on to state that “[a]bortion is a fundamental right . . . it has been a priority for our government to support the reproductive rights of women and girls around the world”, and indicated that American women in need of abortion may travel to Canada in the event they cannot terminate their pregnancies in the US.

As usual, your inability to maintain any semblance of moral consistency in advocating for womens’ rights and bodily autonomy is, to quote Seinfeld, “breathtaking”. Over the past two years of COVID-19 dystopia, neither of you have had any qualms in restricting a woman’s right to choose what medical treatment she accepts, determining what COVID-19 theatrics she is forced to perform, or punishing her for selecting the “wrong” course of action in maintaining bodily autonomy in relation to a virus with a lower fatality rate than the flu.

I have a few questions to which I would appreciate an answer at your earliest convenience:

• Can you please explain where “my body, my choice” starts and finishes for the Liberal Party? It appears to me that the Liberal Party condones any woman being forced to carry an unwanted fetus because that violates her rights to bodily autonomy and privacy; however, the Liberal Party simultaneously supports any corporation or governmental entity forcing the same woman to disclose her vaccination status, and either submit to an experimental treatment or lose her career, her right to travel and, in some cases, her right to access to those same children, once born.

• Can you please explain how this government will treat an unvaccinated American woman who tries to travel to Canada for an abortion? Which medical status trumps the other, as it were? Will her unvaccinated status mean she is prohibited from entering Canada in order to avail herself of medical treatment, or will her pregnancy status mean she is allowed to enter and leave Canada freely, while unvaccinated, pregnant Canadian woman are deprived of that same right?

As per usual, this government’s hypocrisy, cognitive dissonance and pandering to the insane leftists has rendered a situation that cannot be rationalized, either in ethics or logic. I look forward to your explanation re the above – and an acknowledgment that this government respects the bodily autonomy of all people, not just the lucky few who pass your test for worthiness based on which way the winds of wokeness are blowing. And just a reminder – there are 6,000,000 unvaccinated Canadians in this country who are currently being persecuted and deprived of their Charter rights for having the audacity to exercise their freedom of conscience and right to bodily autonomy. Please advise if we all need to obtain a positive pregnancy test in order to be recognized as free citizens of a democratic society.