top of page

Pandemic of the Vaccinated?

Updated: Nov 17, 2022

Sent: July 18, 2022 1:20 PM To:; '' <>; '' <>; '' <> Cc: BRODIE FENLON <>; '' <>; '' <>;; '' <>; '' <>; '' <>; Sheldon Yakiwchuk <>; '' <>; Letnick.MLA, Norm LASS:EX <> Subject: FW: Pandemic of the Vaccinated?

Good afternoon Dr. Henry,

I haven’t received a response from you, but I’m sure you have been very busy tirelessly promoting the vaccination of tots against a virus that keeps mutating into a less and less dangerous variant, while its odds of causing childhood myocarditis, heart attacks, infertility and all sorts of other goodies increase with every dose. Just a follow up to my previous email, and a few questions for you if you don’t mind?

As you know, here are the latest COVID-19 statistics, as provided by the BC CDC:

You will note that the statistics for May 15 to July 9, 2022 look remarkably similar to those I sent to you on June 3, 2022. One can only speculate as to why the Province elected to consolidate almost two months’ worth of data in this latest report, versus the four weeks previously reported. I’m sure it’s because the latest data show how safe and effective the boosters are! Also, can you please explain why the Province hasn’t separated its data into Vaccinated, 3 doses, Vaccinated, 4 doses and Vaccinated, 5 doses? Surely since you are actively promoting the latest round of boosters to prevent serious illness and death, you should be showcasing that success in your pretty charts?

I also note that your “Age-standardized Hospitalization, Critical Care & Death Rates” chart is a tad misleading:

Given that everyone with two or more doses is currently defined as “fully vaccinated” for the purposes of your unfounded and illegal discrimination of healthcare and government workers, why wouldn’t you either further break these numbers down into an accurate dosage count, or consolidate to show that the jabbed are, indeed, significantly more likely to be hospitalized or die from COVID-19 than the misogynistic, extremist, fringe minority “anti-vaxxers”? And, why are unvaccinated 70 year-olds not even shown in your Hospitalization & Critical Care, BC, 70+ chart:

I note that, even though “deaths” are shown in relation to hospitalizations and critical care statistics in other charts, they have been omitted from the above chart – could this have something to do with the fact that when you combine the double- and triple-jabbed deaths in the over-70’s, that number is, quite literally, off the charts:

I’d really love a response to the above. As I have mentioned previously, I submitted a Freedom of Information request with the Province of BC in January, 2022 which inquires into the BC CDC’s definitions of vaccinated, calculations for age adjustment, etc.

Unfortunately, the Ministry of Citizens’ Services is now ignoring me, notwithstanding that it has missed its deadline to produce a response. I also wanted to comment on the dystopian name chosen for the office that is supposed to disseminate information to a citizen, but is now ignoring its legislated duty to that citizen; Orwell himself could not have chosen a better name – Ministry of Truth, however, being a close second!

Thanks in advance for your prompt reply.


Sent: June 3, 2022 10:10 AM To:; '' <>; '' <>; '' <> Cc: BRODIE FENLON <>; '' <>; '' <>;; '' <>; '' <>; '' <>; Sheldon Yakiwchuk <>; '' <> Subject: FW: Pandemic of the Vaccinated?

Good morning Dr. Henry, Mr. Dix and Mr. Horgan,

I haven’t received a response to the below email yet, but hope springs eternal! As you are aware, the data I sent you on May 14, 2022 looks a lot like the Province’s latest data, showing COVID-19 statistics from May 1-28, 2022:

When one delves further into the data, the demographic that is still at the highest risk of dying from COVID-19 are those triple vaccinated, who are over 70 years of age – followed by those double vaccinated, in the same age category:

Can you please advise when those who refused an experimental treatment for a virus less fatal than the flu can expect a public apology from all levels of government for inciting hatred and falsely blaming them for (a) causing a pandemic, and (b) wasting valuable hospital resources? An admission that your COVID-19 pandemic “strategy” was a complete failure would, of course, be appreciated as well. It really isn’t too late to admit that you were all bamboozled by the Federal Government’s adoption of CCP lockdown protocols without performing any independent research or risk-benefit analysis; unless pride or cognitive dissonance are prohibiting you from acknowledging what amounts to the Emperor’s New Clothes at this point.

I’m still waiting for my FOIP response, would you believe!!! I’m not sure if the Province is struggling with my request to produce data that should be at its fingertips, or if the correspondence between various governmental officials and the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers that I have requested is being heavily redacted as we speak.

Mainstream media: your silence (and complicity) is deafening.


Sent: May 14, 2022 10:13 AM To:;;; Cc: BRODIE FENLON <>;;;;;;;; Sheldon Yakiwchuk <> Subject: Pandemic of the Vaccinated?

Dr. Henry,

Do you remember last winter, when you stated that the COVID-19 pandemic was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”, and warned the citizens of BC that the only way out of this situation was to accept the COVID-19 vaccine in order to be a responsible citizen and neighbour? I’m wondering if you care to explain the BC CDC’s latest data, available here: As I’m sure you are aware, the COVID-19 health outcomes by vaccination status from April 10 to May 7, 2022 look like this:

Would you care to provide your thoughts on the chart on the right, which shows that 90% of deaths in British Columbia over this time period were in the “fully” vaccinated, with the vast majority being boosted? Would it be safe to state that the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” has now metamorphosed into a “pandemic of the vaccinated”, as predicted last year by Geert Vanden Bossche and countless other scientists? And, if this is the case, why have you not made a statement via mainstream media about these dirty, superspreading triple vaxxed public health threats? Perhaps, they should be banned from sporting events, weddings, churches and restaurants? (Of course, we will still let them serve us at said facilities as long as they wear their ineffective, bacteria-breeding cloth masks: we’re not monsters, after all.)

Question for you: what data will you need to review before you publicly admit that (a) the vaccine rollout has been an abject failure, and (b) the vaccines are neither safe, nor effective? And, if you don’t care to admit these facts, have you been ordered to ignore the evidence, financially or politically compromised, or are you suffering from a severe case of cognitive dissonance?

I’d love to dive deeper into this data, but unfortunately your government still owes me a response to my FOIP request (submitted January 14, 2022) asking for the definitions of “fully”, “partially”, and “not” vaccinated, as well as the calculation method for “age adjusting” that was used in order to allege that the unvaxxed were the root cause of the pandemic. I suspect the data above would look even worse if not for the government’s manipulation of these definitions, but sadly, I can’t prove that … yet.

CBC/Castanet/Global/CTV/Globe and Mail: does anyone have any intellectual curiosity about the above data? Or, are we still “following the $cience”? And do any of you lie awake at night feeling guilt about the role you have played in dividing society and coercing the ovine into accepting an unnecessary and potentially lethal experimental treatment so that Alberta Bourla can buy himself another ivory backscratcher?

Looking forward to a response! Or better yet, a formal inquiry.

256 views1 comment

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page