Email to the Premier
Updated: Nov 14, 2022
Sent: November 8, 2021 1:42 PM
Let me be the first to congratulate you on being the BC record-holder for quickest diagnosis-to-treatment in the past decade(s). I’m assuming that the fact that you were scheduled for surgery and radiation immediately after you found a growth in your throat means that the BC healthcare system is not, in fact, broken as you have represented on multiple occasions, and the last few months of blaming the unvaccinated for a backlog in hospital treatments has been corrected. Well done! And as a cancer survivor (who unfortunately had to seek treatment in Mexico to the tune of $200,000 in 2019, as the treatment options presented to me at that time were nowhere near as speedy as yours), I wish you a quick recovery and continued good health.
A friend directed me to the following article today, and I wanted to highlight it to you as well as Dr. Henry and Mr. Dix: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/we-will-kill-117-kids-to-save-one?fbclid=IwAR3NxhKDfhuzHIJZSncRSiowh--54J_IXA6TvOvneVS2CsZM01347-NwXMM . This article, of course, links to several others backing up the statements found therein. No doubt you are aware of all of the corruption and obfuscation surrounding Pfizer’s data reporting and justification for Emergency Use Authorization of its COVID-19 “vaccine”, but it never hurts to read yet another brilliant analysis reminding one of all of the reasons why your approval of these treatments is likely to be imminently actionable in a court of law. If you don’t have time to read the article, here are some of the highlights assessing Pfizer’s “data”, if one may call it that:
For every one child saved by the Pfizer vaccine, 117 children will be killed by it.
Pfizer’s own data shows that vaccinated people have a fourfold risk of dying from cardiac arrest.
The trial of children ages 5-11 was both too small (2300 participants) and too short (2 months). I think we can all agree that vaccine-induced deaths relating to cancer (a disease near and dear to both of our hearts), myocarditis, etc. are unlikely to occur within two months of “the jab”. And as you and I know, a cancer diagnosis is one of the scariest things that can be inflicted upon a family: can you imagine how much worse a parent would feel if that diagnosis was the direct result of trusting the government and providing “informed” consent to an experimental vaccine without even understanding the increased risks to one’s child for a virus that statistically would never have harmed them?
The statistician calculated the “number needed to treat” in order to prevent a single fatality in children as 1,261,550, but of course the “number needed to treat” in order to prevent one hospitalization per Pfizer’s data is actually infinity at present, given that no child in the treatment or control group of Pfizer’s study was actually hospitalized.
There are many other nuances to be pulled from the above link, but of course you and I are not statisticians and are relying on the experts to make ethical, unbiased and rational cost-benefit analyses.
As an aside, are you confident that your recent diagnosis is unrelated to your recent vaccination? The internet tells me you were “fully” vaccinated on June 18, 2021 and suffered a cancer recurrence approximately four months post-vaccine. Unfortunately Pfizer’s deliberate failure to maintain a control group means that we don’t know from its data whether one is at increased risk of a recurrence after being vaccinated; however, we do know from Dr. Cole and others that many physicians are seeing increased rates of cancers that temporally correlate with recent vaccination.