"Anti-Vax Tour Rolls Through"


Sent: October 27, 2022 2:51 PM To: 'jon@castanet.net' <jon@castanet.net> Subject: "Anti-Vax Tour Rolls Through"


Mr. Manchester,


I normally don’t respond to Castanet’s biased reporting as there are obviously not enough hours in the day to address every occurrence. Nonetheless, this headline really irked me, and I’d like to point out a few things to you and Castanet for your edification:

  • Most people who have been labeled as “anti-vax” during the past two years’ smear campaign were current on all vaccines up until 2019. This includes myself and my husband who, contrary to mainstream media’s assertions, don’t have a death wish, nor are we hippies who eschew the benefits of modern medicine. We do, however, have the ability to critically interpret statistical data,as well as a problem trusting authority, multi-national entities and fast-tracked medical treatments in the face of the world’s largest asset transfer from the poor to the rich. (Remember this fun settlement?? https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history.) We also aren’t keen on abiding by lockdown restrictions and the nonsensical “quarantining” of healthy people promulgated by the People’s Republic of China and swallowed hook, line and sinker by our fearless leaders and mainstream media.

  • As reported by Castanet via Glacier Media quite regularly, the Province of British Columbia doesn’t actually report accurate COVID-19 death rates; however it appears that the infection and fatality case rates of COVID-19 are similar (and for Omicron, well below) those of influenza and, at the peak of the pandemic, one’s odds of surviving this “deadly” disease were 99.97% (almost 100% if one was young and healthy). (My father-in-law became a COVID-19 statistic when he died in hospital last year; despite not having a positive COVID-19 test and having pre-existing conditions, guess what his death certificate states?)

  • The COVID-19 “vaccines” are not, in actuality, vaccines in the traditional sense of the word. As you are likely aware, until spring 2021 the CDC defined vaccine as “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease”. At some point after that, the CDC revised this definition to “[a] preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases”. Now why do you think that was? (Could it possibly be because Gates, Fauci, Bourla et al were scared the grift was going to end?)

  • The assertion has been made that, notwithstanding every politician and pharmaceutical company repeatedly stating otherwise for the past two years, the “vaccines” were never meant to prevent transmission, but rather to reduce the severity of illness should one contract COVID-19; in other words, the vaccine campaign was never about saving Grandma, but rather to test the ovine compliance of the masses when offered an experimental treatment for a disease that is not a statistical threat to anyone under the age of 70. And how the sheeple did sheep, wouldn’t you agree? Who knew so many were so eager to dogpile onto Canada’s unter-vaccine-menschen without any proof that they were plague-spreaders?

  • Remember Dr. Henry’s Donut Charts blaming the unvaccinated for the COVID-19 pandemic? Has anyone at Castanet thought to ask her why she no longer publishes this data, which should be prima facie proof that the unvaccinated are dying in droves, whilst their quadruple-jabbed peers nonchalantly cram themselves into claustrophobia-inducing spaces with hordes of their vaccinated peers, knowing they are “protected”? (Fun fact: I submitted a FOIP request to the Government of BC on January 20, 2022 of this year seeking, in part, definitions of “fully vaccinated”, “partially vaccinated” and “not vaccinated”, as well as the calculations used by the BC Government in determining “age-adjusted” COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations, as published regularly by mainstream news sources, including Castanet. So far, the three constants in my life seem to be death, taxes, and a monthly email from the BC Ministry of Health advising that they just don’t wanna send me a response yet. Care to take this baton and run with it?)

The funniest part of your article is that you weren’t even able to discredit the purpose of the Justice for the Vaccinated tour; as you note, these doctors, at great personal expense, are crusading to bring attention to adverse events resulting from the COVID-19 vaccines. Why on earth would they be jeopardizing their professional reputations and financial stability if they hadn’t seen some scientific evidence for the claims they are making? This is especially amusing in light of the fact that Castanet has actually reported on several severe, vaccine adverse events (and has assiduously avoided reporting on many more, including the cashier who dropped dead while working at a Kelowna liquor store, and the unfortunate soul who died in their car after a little vaxx stop at Trinity Church – and I don’t remember seeing this article anywhere on Castanet, either: https://thepulse.one/2022/10/01/woman-dies-in-shoppers-drug-mart-7-minutes-after-covid-19-vaccine-booster/). You attempt to smear the good doctors in your last paragraph, stating that Dr. Malthouse “made false claims the vaccine could magnetize recipients”; apparently you haven’t been on Tik Tok or other social media apps lately, where many of the vaccinated like to post themselves sticking spoons to their foreheads, etc. (Some of them are doing so from hospital beds in an attempt to prevent others from receiving the “vaccine”.)


You also try to discredit Dr. Hoffe by noting he directed people to buy Ivermectin. As you may or may not be aware, there are many studies showing that Ivermectin may be effective in reducing COVID-19 symptoms, and many countries (including Mexico, Brazil and India – the ones not captured by Big Pharma and The Gates Foundation) effectively used Ivermectin during the pandemic: this was often used in conjunction with Vitamin C, Vitamin D, NAC and other supplements which, of course, are all hocus pocus as well! (Please disregard all studies showing a direct correlation between said supplements and immunity, clearly they were written by people who had ingested too much horse paste.) Of course, Ivermectin is not patented, so no one in the pharmaceutical industry, or our government, has much incentive to promote its use. If only someone could invent a similar anti-viral medication that could be sold for $530 USD per course!! How great would that be. Ironically enough, no one seems to hold the vaccines to the same standard as Ivermectin in first, doing no harm. You have access to the same studies that I do showing that myocarditis is at least four times higher in the vaccinated, and the vaccinated are experiencing a myriad of other health issues, including Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, blood clots, Bells Palsy and strokes, at unprecedented rates.

If you require any studies or proof regarding any of my above statements, I would be glad to send you some reading materials. Also, I’ll be at the “Anti-Vax Tour” on Saturday in downtown Kelowna to show my support for these brave doctors who have risked everything for the truth. Happy to meet for a coffee with you or any of your peers to elaborate on any of the above. I promise I won’t call you a complacent sheep, if you don’t accuse me of wearing a tin hat!


In all seriousness, this name calling and slandering needs to stop if society is going to heal and move on from the atrocities we have all experienced over the past two years. Vaccinated or unvaccinated, our government has been at war with all of us over the past two years, and it would be great if the media could start to talk about that, instead of perpetuating harmful myths that people who exercise bodily autonomy are a danger to society.


Thank you for your time.

82 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All